DEBT SET-OFF upto $12,000

Special offer
On request
Product no.:
AD1
No. items in stock:
999
List Price:
$425.00
You save:
$200.00 (47%)
Your price:
$225.00
Description

KNOWTHELEDGE©

This is for each debt. Which includes OFF-SETTING (Elimination) of each debt. Multiple debt discount donations availiable. We shall ELIMINATE ANY CORPORATION DEBT FOR YOU WITHIN 180 DAYS! Each Donor gains access via email to multiple sources of DEBT KNOWLEDGE and weekly conference calls to our Prosperity Minister J. Reynolds and Brother Ralph! Also ask about our 180 day donation plan for larger help!

GREAT HELPFUL FORMS, LETTERS, AND KNOWLEDGE CAN BE OBTAINED AT https://www.dropbox.com/s/t8rrgi0dlo3sfgq/Liberty%20Aid%20Package-4.0.doc?dl=0 TO ASSIST IN BREAKING THE CHAINS  OF DEBT

Advanced Civics Research Library
 
Structure Of The Birth Certificate Did the State Pledge Your Body to a Bank?
 
Right: Some birth and marriage certificates are now "warehouse receipts," printed on banknote paper, which may mark you and yours as 'chattel' property of the banks that our government borrows from every day.
 
By: David Deschesne  Editor, Fort Fairfield Journal Fort Fairfield Journal, May 11, 2005 A certificate is a "paper establishing an ownership claim." - Barron's Dictionary of Banking Terms. Registration of births began in 1915, by the Bureau of Census, with all states adopting the practice by 1933. Birth and marriage certificates are a form of securities called "warehouse receipts." The items included on a warehouse receipt, as descried at §7-202 of the Uniform Commercial Code, the law which governs commercial paper and transactions, which parallel a birth or marriage certificate are: -the location of the warehouse where the goods are stored...(residence) -the date of issue of the receipt.....("Date issued") -the consecutive number of the receipt...(found on back or front of the certificate, usually in red numbers) -a description of the goods or of the packages containing them...(name, sex, date of birth, etc.) -the signature of the warehouseman, which may be made by his authorized agent...(municipal clerk or state registrar's signature) Birth/marriage certificates now appear to at least qualify as "warehouse receipts" under the Uniform Commercial Code. Black's Law Dictionary, Seventh Edition, defines: warehouse receipt. "...A warehouse receipt, which is considered a document of title, may be a negotiable instrument and is often used for financing with inventory as security." Since the U.S. went bankrupt in 1933, all new money has to be borrowed into existence. All states started issuing serial-numbered, certificated "warehouse receipts" for births and marriages in order to pledge us as collateral against those loans and municipal bonds taken out with the Federal Reserve's banks. The "Full faith and Credit" of the American people is said to be that which back the nation's debt. That simply means the American people's ability to labor and pay back that debt. In order to catalog its laborers, the
Structure of the Birth Certificate 1
government needed an efficient, methodical system of tracking its property to that end. Humans today are looked upon merely as resources - "human resources" that is. Governmental assignment of a dollar value to the heads of citizens began on July 14, 1862 when President Lincoln offered 6 percent interest bearing-bonds to states who freed their slaves on a "per head" basis. This practice of valuating humans (cattle?) continues today with our current system of debt-based currency reliant upon a steady stream of fresh new chattels to back it.
 
Additional Birth Certificate Research Federal Children by Joyce Rosenwald In 1921, the federal Sheppard-Towner Maternity Act created the birth "registration" or what we now know as the "birth certificate." It was known as the "Maternity Act" and was sold to the American people as a law that would reduce maternal and infant mortality, protect the health of mothers and infants, and for "other purposes." One of those other purposes provided for the establishment of a federal bureau designed to cooperate with state agencies in the overseeing of its operations and expenditures. What it really did was create a federal birth registry which exists today, creating "federal children." This government, under the doctrine of "Parens Patriae" now legislates for American children as if they are owned by the federal government. Through the public school enrollment process and continuing license requirements for most aspects of daily life, these children grow up to be adults indoctrinated into the process of asking for "permission" from ‘big Daddy’ government to do all those things necessary to carry out daily activities that exist in what is called a "free country." Before 1921 the records of births and names of children were entered into family bibles, as were the records of marriages and deaths. These records were readily accepted by both the family and the law as "official" records. Since 1921 the American people have been registering the births and names of their children with the government of the state in which they are born, even though there is no federal law requiring it. The state tells you that registering your child's birth through the birth certificate serves as proof that he/she was born in the united States, thereby making him/her a United States Citizen. For the past several years a social security number has been mandated by the federal government to be issued at birth. In 1933, bankruptcy was declared by President Roosevelt. The governors of the then 48 States pledged the "full faith and credit" of their states, including the citizenry, as collateral for loans of credit from the Federal Reserve System. To wit: "Full faith and credit" clause of Const. U.S. article 4. sec. 1 requires that foreign judgment be given such faith and credit as it had by law or usage of state of its origin. That foreign statutes are to have force and effect to which they are entitled in home state. And that a judgment or record shall have the same faith, credit, conclusive effect, and obligatory force in other states as it has by law or usage in the state from whence taken. Black's Law Dictionary, Fourth Edition cites omitted.
Structure of the Birth Certificate 2
The state claims an interest in every child within its jurisdiction. The state (via CPS) will, if it deems it necessary, nullify your parental rights and appoint a guardian (trustee) over your children. The subject of every birth certificate is a child. The child is a valuable asset, which if properly trained, can contribute valuable assets provided by its labor for many years. It is presumed by those who have researched this issue, that the child itself is the asset of the trust established by the birth certificate, and the social security number is the numbering or registration of the trust, allowing for the assets of the trust to be tracked. If this information is true, your child is now owned by the state. Each one of us, including our children, are considered assets of the bankrupt UNITED STATES. We are now designated by this government as "HUMAN RESOURCES" with a new crop born every year. In 1923, a suit was brought against federal officials charged with the administration of the maternity act, who were citizens of another state, to enjoin them from enforcing it, wherein the plaintiff averred that the act was unconstitutional, and that it's purpose was to induce the States to yield sovereign rights reserved by them through the federal Constitution's 10th amendment and not granted to the federal government, and that the burden of the appropriations falls unequally upon the several States, held, that, as the statute does not require the plaintiff to do or yield anything, and as no burden is imposed by it other than that of taxation, which falls, not on the State but on her inhabitants, who are within the federal as well as the state taxing power, the complaint resolves down to the naked contention that Congress has usurped reserved powers of the States by the mere enactment of the statute, though nothing has been, or is to be, done under it without their consent (Commonwealth of Massachusetts vs. Mellon, Secretary of the Treasury, et al.; Frothingham v. Mellon, Secretary of the Treasury et. al..) Mr. Alexander Lincoln, Assistant Attorney General, argued for the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. To wit: I. The act is unconstitutional. It purports to vest in agencies of the Federal Government powers which are almost wholly undefined, in matters relating to maternity and infancy, and to authorize appropriations of federal funds for the purposes of the act. Many examples may be given and were stated in the debates on the bill in Congress of regulations which may be imposed under the act. THE FORCED REGISTRATION OF PREGNANCY, GOVERNMENTAL PRENATAL EXAMINATION OF EXPECTANT MOTHERS, RESTRICTIONS ON THE RIGHT OF A WOMAN TO SECURE THE SERVICES OF A MIDWIFE OR PHYSICIAN OF HER OWN SELECTION, are measures to which the people of those States which accept its provisions may be subjected. There is nothing which prohibits the payment of subsidies out of federal appropriations. INSURANCE OF MOTHERS MAY BE MADE COMPULSORY. THE TEACHING OF BIRTH CONTROL AND PHYSICAL INSPECTION OF PERSONS ABOUT TO MARRY MAY BE REQUIRED. By section 4 of the act, the Children's Bureau is given all necessary powers to cooperate with the state agencies in the administration of the act. Hence it is given the power to assist in the enforcement of the plans submitted to it, and for that purpose by its agents to go into the several States and to do those acts for which the plans submitted may provide. As to what those plans shall provide, the final arbiters are the Bureau and the Board. THE FACT THAT IT WAS CONSIDERED NECESSARY IN EXPLICIT TERMS TO PRESERVE FROM INVASION BY FEDERAL OFFICIALS THE RIGHT OF THE
Structure of the Birth Certificate 3
PARENT TO THE CUSTODY AND CARE OF HIS CHILD AND THE SANCTITY OF HIS HOME SHOWS HOW FAR REACHING ARE THE POWERS WHICH WERE INTENDED TO BE GRANTED BY THE ACT. (1) The act is invalid because it assumes powers not granted to Congress and usurps the local police power. McCulloch v. Maryland, 4 Wheat. 316, 405; United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542, 549-551. In more recent cases, however, the Court has shown that there are limits to the power of Congress to pass legislation purporting to be based on one of the powers expressly granted to Congress which in fact usurps the reserved powers of the States, and that laws showing on their face detailed regulation of a matter wholly within the police power of the States will be held to be unconstitutional although they purport to be passed in the exercise of some constitutional power. Hammer v. Dagenhart, 247 U.S. 251; Child Labor Tax Case, 259 U.S. 20; Hill v. Wallace, 259 U.S. 44. The act is not made valid by the circumstance that federal powers are to be exercised only with respect to those States which accept the act, for Congress cannot assume, and state legislatures cannot yield, the powers reserved to the States by the Constitution. Message of President Monroe, May 4, 1822; 4 Elliot's Debates, p. 525; Pollard's Lessee v. Hagan, 3 How. 212; Escanaba Co. v. Chicago, 107 U.S. 678; Coyle v. Oklahoma, 221 U.S. 559; Cincinnati v. Louisville & Nashville R.R. Co., 223 U.S. 390. (2) The act is invalid because it imposes on each State an illegal option either to yield a part of its powers reserved by the Tenth Amendment or to give up its share of appropriations under the act. A statute attempting, by imposing conditions upon a general privilege, to exact a waiver of a constitutional right, is null and void. Harrison v. St. Louis & San Francisco R.R. Co., 232 U.S. 318; Terral v. Burke Construction Co., 257 U.S. 529. (3) The act is invalid because it sets up a system of government by cooperation between the Federal Government and certain of the States, not provided by the Constitution. Congress cannot make laws for the States, and it cannot delegate to the States the power to make laws for the United States . In re Rahrer, 140 U.S. 545; Knickerbocker Ice Co. v. Stewart, 253 U.S. 149; Opinion of the Justices, 239 Mass. 606. The Maternity Act was eventually repealed, but parts of it have been found in other legislative acts. What this act attempted to do was set up government by appointment, run by bureaucrats with re-delegated authority to tax, which is in itself unconstitutional. What was once declared as unconstitutional by the Supreme Court of this nation in the past should be upheld in a court challenge today. The constitution hasn't changed. What has changed is the way this government views human life. Today we are defined as human resources, believed to be owned by government. The government now wants us, as individuals, to be tagged and tracked. Government mandated or legislated National I.D. is unconstitutional anyway you look at it. Federal jurisdiction to legislate for the several states does not exist and could never survive a court challenge as shown above. Writing letters to elected public servants won't save us when we all know their agenda does not include serving those who placed them in power. Perhaps the 10th amendment of the federal constitution guaranteeing states rights will, if challenged, when making it known that we as individuals of the several states will not be treated as chattel of the U.S.
Structure of the Birth Certificate 4
government. If the federal government believes they own us, and as such have the right to demand national I.D. cards, and health I.D. cards, which will in truth tag us as we tag our animals, then let them bring forth the documents to prove their authority to legislate for it. If our GOD given unalienable rights to life, liberty and freedom, which were the foundation upon which this nation was created do not exist and liberty and freedom is only an illusion under which the American people suffer, then let the governments of this nation come forward and tell the people. But...if we are indeed free, then we should not have to plead or beg before our elected public servants to be treated as such. If, in truth we are not free, then perhaps it's time to let the final chapter of the Great American Revolution be written.
 
 

Ten Basic Foundations Of Commercial Law
The Birth Certificate

First, you must know exactly what is considered to be the key element, within the presumed contract, that holds title and ownership to a real man’s labors, Rights, intellect, and property through his persona. This foundational element is legally called an “instrument”, but you know it as your Birth Certificate. Since the early 1960’s, Birth Certificates were issued by the governments to personae with all CAPITALIZED lettered names. This is not a Lawful record of your physical birth, but something totally different. A Birth Certificate is the government’s commercial instrument to their legal Title of Ownership or Deed to your “straw man” (don’t forget that the presumption in contract is that the real you and your persona are one and the same). This Commercial Record or Commercial Instrument (Birth Certificate) is a legal commercial “receipt”. It’s no different than any other commercial Bill of Lading or a Warehouse Receipt. Delivery of the commercial “goods” was made to the government at your local hospital. For clarity, view a Birth Certificate as a Commercial “Document of Title”. While this “Document of Title” is not the Title itself, it is parallel to a commercial Certificate of Title or Certificate of Birth.

UCC 1-201 Definitions–

“Document of title” includes bill of lading, dock warrant, dock receipt, warehouse receipt or order for the delivery of goods, and also any other document which in the regular course of business or financing is treated as adequately evidencing that the person in possession of it is entitled to receive, hold and dispose of the document and the goods it covers.

“Bill of lading” means a document evidencing the receipt of goods for shipment issued by a person engaged in the business of transporting or forwarding goods [a hospital, for example], and includes an airbill.
The U.S. corporate Federal Government is bankrupt and holds no Constitutionally mandated silver or gold (coin and bullion) to back up or pay their debts. All privately held and federally held gold coins and bullion in America was seized by Executive Order of April 5, 1933 and paid to the creditor, the private Federal Reserve Bank Corporation (FRB) under the terms of bankruptcy. Then, in 1964, coins with no silver content were issued and the Constitutional silver coins were recalled and seized. Further evidence of this was the shortage of industrial silver and bullion from the mid-1960’s through mid-1970’s. The small inventories of silver available during this period was astronomically expensive. We called the copper edged coins “LBJ funny-money” at the time, not understanding or knowing that all the silver was being turned over to the creditor, the privately owned FRB.

The only asset the Federal U.S. government has in order to pay their corporate debt is the people themselves, so they commercially pledge birthright Americans as collateral for credit (loans) to pay daily operational costs. The technical way this is done is astoundingly simple but relatively unknown.

When a child is born within the corporate United States, a Record of Live Birth form (a commercial Bill of Lading), or similar, is issued by the hospital. The father and mother sign this hospital form (a receipt for goods) as the parents (manufacturer) and title holders (owners) of the goods (child). The transfer of the property Rights (the child’s Rights) to the State is accepted by the signature of their government agent, a State licensed Physician. The parents have unknowingly pledged their child’s future and labors to the government and signed a presumed contract. This converts the legal status of their child to that of chattel property in permanently indentured servitude (See Preface, Part I). The State becomes the de facto holder of the Rights to the child (collateral).

Next, the hospital sends the Record of Live Birth to the State Bureau of Vital Statistics, sometimes called the department of Health and Rehabilitative Services (HRS) in some States. Each State is required to supply the Federal government with birth, death, and health statistics. The State agency that receives the Record of Live Birth (title) keeps it and then issues a Birth Certificate (BC). The BC is a commercial instrument (document) evidencing that the State is holding the title (ownership) to the child. Holding the title is not the same as having possession of the property, so the State is the “holder” of the instrument but not the “holder in due course”. This is all based on the presumed acceptance of the contract (Record of Live Birth) between the manufacturer (parents) and the purchaser (State). The parents are not aware of this assumed contract because it was never revealed to them nor was full disclosure made in good faith, so they don’t object to what they don’t know. The current holder of your commercial birth document (receipt) is able to capitalize on it because of your failure to instruct the holder to do otherwise, due to your silence and lack of legal action.

cer·tif·i·cate, noun. Middle English certificat, from Middle French, from Medieval Latin certificatum, from Late Latin, neuter of certificatus, past participle of certificare, to certify, 15th century. 3 : a document evidencing ownership or debt. (Merriam Webster Dictionary 1998).

This Birth Certificate issued by the State is then registered with the U.S. Department of Commerce through their agency, the U.S. Census Bureau, who is responsible to collect vital statistics from all the States. The word “registered”, in commercial law, does notmean that your name was merely noted in a registry or book for reference purposes. When a Birth Certificate is registered with the U.S. Department of Commerce, it means that the child’s persona named on it has become a surety or guarantor as collateral for a commercial loan.

registered. Security, bond. (Merriam-Webster’s Dictionary of Law 1996)

Security. 1a: Something (as a mortgage or collateral) that is provided to make certain the fulfillment of an obligation. Example: used his property as security for a loan. 1b: “surety“. 2: Evidence of indebtedness, ownership, or the right to ownership.

Bond. 1a: A usually formal written agreement by which a person undertakes to perform a certain act (as fulfill the obligations of a contract) …with the condition that failure to perform or abstain will obligate the person …to pay a sum of money or will result in the forfeiture of money put up by the person or surety. 1b: One who acts as a surety. 2: An interest-bearing document giving evidence of a debt issued by a government body or corporation that is sometimes secured by a lien on property and is often designed to take care of a particular financial need.

Surety. The person who has pledged him or herself to pay back money or perform a certain action if the principal to a contract fails, as collateral, and as part of the original contract. (Duhaime’s Law Dictionary)

1:a formal engagement (as a pledge) given for the fulfillment of an undertaking. 2: one who promises to answer for the debt or default of another. Under the Uniform Commercial Code, however, a surety includes a guarantor, and the two terms are generally interchangeable.(Merriam-Webster’s Dictionary of Law 1996)

Guarantor. A person who pledges collateral for the contract of another, but separately, as part of an independently contract with the obligee of the original contract. (Duhaime’s Law Dictionary)

It’s not difficult to see that a Birth Certificate is a document evidencing debt the moment it’s issued. This is how it works: Once each State has registered, by commercial bulk transfer, the Birth Certificates with the U.S. Department of Commerce, the U.S. Department of the Treasury then issues Treasury Securities in the form of Treasury Bonds, Notes, and Bills using the BC’s as sureties or guarantors for these purported Securities. This means that the bankrupt corporate U.S. can guarantee to the purchasers of their Securities the lifetime labor of all Americans as collateral for payment. Isn’t it nice to know that when you were born, within days you became the collateral for corporate U.S. debt-loans through the assumed contract your parents thought was nothing more than a Record of Live Birth? But wait… the chain of events gets even more interesting.
Who purchases these Treasury Securities? Nearly all are purchased by commercial institutions and brokerage firms on behalf of their individual clients. These purchases are called commercial book entry transactions whereby the individual purchaser never receives a paper stock certificate. Follow very closely and see if you can notice the monopoly and identity of the World Power Brokers unfolding here. Key words are underlined:

1. The commercial book entry system is operated exclusively by the privately owned Federal Reserve System(formerly the Federal Reserve Bank) as fiscal agents of the U.S. Treasury Department.

2. All these securities are recorded in the commercial book entry system as “book entry issues” held for the account of the depository institution.

3. The exclusive depository institution is the Depository Trust Company(DTC), a privately owned trust company (bank), who maintains records identifying the individual “beneficial owners” of securities that the DTC holds (holder) in its account in the commercial book entry system.

4. The Depository Trust Company is an operating unit of ( owned by) the Federal Reserve System.

5. The Depository Trust Company transfers all the securities to their own private holding company Cede & Company.

6. Cede & Company is the holder of nearly $20 trillion ($ 20,000,000,000,000) of stocks and bonds.

7. The Federal Reserve System uses the Treasury Securities it holds as collateral to print and issue Federal Reserve Notes, which are further debt obligations.

What starts out as a Record of Birth becomes a monopoly of collateral slavery in the hands of the World Power Brokers, also known as the privately owned Federal Reserve System. The ultimate Real Party ofInterest to your persona, or strawman, is Cede & Company since you are the collateral and surety for the Treasury Securities that are physically held by them in their name. It’s worthy to note that as you walk up to the DTC skyscraper at 55 Water Street in New York City, the sign in the front says “The Tower of Power”.

When you reclaim the Title, Deed and ownership of the real you through your Birth Certificate by accepting it back for it’s commercial value, you will regain your sovereignty, Freedom and Liberty. The “Wizards of Oz” (also known as the World Power Brokers) who have alleged to be the Real Party of Interest (RPOI), and all their agents, will then be legally powerless. Legally, only you can give yourself back your own inherent sovereignty.

Once again, the foundational truth being that “all law is contract”, the World Power Brokers (WPB) have successfully made their claims by making us subject, via contract, to their sovereignty and ownership. The same rules that have made us servants and slaves to the WPB can also set us free from their legal claims. The key is going to the source and making it apply to our current legal status dilemna. There are many maxims (truths or proverbs) of Law that state this:

Nihil tam naturale est, qu m eo genere quidque dissolvere, quo colligatum est– It is very natural that an obligation should not be dissolved but by the same principles which were observed in contracting it.

Qui evertit causam, evertit causatum futurum– He who overthrows the cause, overthrows its future effects.

Sublata causa tollitur effectus–Remove the cause and the effect will cease.

Cujusque rei potissima pars principium est– The principal part of everything is in the beginning.

The WPB followed these same Legal Rules to set up their “system”. We must follow the same legal Rules to escape their “system”. Knowing how they set this up is an element behind the reasoning for its existence.

When the original thirteen sovereign nations of North America declared and received independence more than 200 years ago, the World Power Brokers – comprised of kings, bankers, and merchants – lost a wealth of future commerce and profits from their previous Colony Franchises and Letters Patent. Since then, the WPB’s have continually strived and schemed to regain their control and ownership of the real American People. They have been the instrumental force behind the conversion of free American states into the corporate and commercial United States. They have founded their “takeover” on outright deceit and presumptions without a single outcry from the American People. However, those presumptions and implied contracts can be rebutted according to the legalities they themselves have set into place. It’s kind of like the old saying, “What’s good for the goose is good for the gander”. In order to get in the front door, they had to leave the back door open for their own protection in case they needed to escape. But who’s to say their servants can’t use the same back door to escape? The law says we can and the door has been left wide open. They simply cannot abolish the legal means of our escape unless they abolish the legal means that put them in power and control.

Their entire plan backfires in their faces when the contract presumptions are rebutted by the same legal Rules and Procedures they have set into place. The only reason they have succeeded to this point is that the American People now live in a false complacency; happy and satisfied with their debt contracts for houses, cars, boats, airplanes, and much more. But, many of us know that this lifestyle is soon to change into a more realistic picture of actual and physical servitude and slavery. The debts must be paid. Not only is the U.S. Government broke, but so are the American People. Had Christian Americans followed the principles and Laws written in the Bible, as did the early Americans, they would never be in this position. There is no doubt that the World Power Brokers have been dangling the bait of debt/credit as a means to entice the common man to obtain material wealth without having to pay up front for it. Has any average American ever taken the time to think what would happen if the loans they now have were all “called in” for payment? Where will you house your family? How will you drive to your job? How will you purchase your food?

“Can’t happen”, commented an ABA Lawyer reviewing this material. When we pointed out that any declared “emergency” by the bankrupt Federal Government voids the payment terms of all contracts and legally all debt becomes “due and payable at will”, he thought about it again and had to agree with us. Our premise for argument was that Roosevelt confiscated all the gold in 1933 just for that purpose, as well as the Uniform Commercial Code itself, which states:

UCC 1-208 Option to accelerate at will.–A term providing that one party or the party’s successor in interest may accelerate payment or performance or require collateral or additional collateral “at will” or “when she or he deems herself or himself insecure” or in words of similar import shall be construed to mean that she or he shall have power to do so only if she or he in good faith believes that the prospect of payment or performance is impaired. The burden of establishing lack of good faith is on the party against whom the power has been exercised.  

Method of Rebuttal

In 1988, the federal and corporate United States joined the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods which now governs contracts within its scope. According to international and universal (uniform) Contract Law, such as the UCC, a contract can only be valid if it follows all the Rules and Process of law that created it. One of the main elements or rules of contract law states that “all parties must understand the scope, nature, terms, and conditions of the contract”. Another main element states that “all parties must consent to the contract”. If it is not agreed to and there is no mutual consent, then there is no contract. Any purported commercial contract that fails to be entered into by mutual “good faith”, with full disclosure of the terms and conditions to both parties, and consent by all parties, is void ab initio (from the beginning). Whenever the elements of “good faith” disclosure and/or “consent” are missing, any contract can automatically be ruled null and void if the deceived or defrauded party enforces the Rules of Law. Once again, silence is default. If you say nothing, you have defaulted.

UCC 1-203 Obligation of good faith.–Every contract or duty within this code imposes an obligation of good faith in its performance or enforcement.

Were you aware of the implied and “presumed” contract between you and the Real Party of Interest, the owners of the Federal Reserve System? In all law and truth, it doesn’t exist, does it?

UCC 1-201 Definitions– (31) “Presumption” or “presumed” means that the trier of fact must find the existence of the fact presumed unless and until evidence is introduced which would support a finding of its nonexistence.

Were all terms and conditions disclosed to you at birth or any time since then? Of course not. Legally, once you rebut the presumption by affidavit for failure to disclose the terms and conditions or obtain mutual consent, the contract automatically becomes null and void. Such a contract as this, which has unlawfully bound the average American to it, is considered fraud or misrepresentation. For example:

UCC 1-103 Supplementary general principles of law applicable.–Unless displaced by the particular provisions of this code, the principles of law and equity, including the law merchant and the law relative to capacity to contract, principal and agent, estoppel, fraud, misrepresentation, duress, coercion, mistake, bankruptcy, or other validating or invalidatingcauseshall supplement its provisions.

As you can now see, the major flaw in all artificial governments and their “laws” is the absence of a genuine and legal agreement between the parties due to a failure to fully disclose, have a meeting of the minds, and lack mutual “good faith”. In their presumption that you have agreed to a bona fidecontract with the government, you were never informed of the full terms and conditions of the purported contract.

The reason this situation could exist in the first place is due to the fact that the American People have fooled themselves, lied to themselves, and failed to communicate among themselves. They have put aside their Holy Bibles and replaced the True Law of God with the laws of men. The world of man’s laws and governments was brought about by the very people who are now servants to the “system”. Since Lincoln’s War, Christian Americans have lived in fear of speaking out against wrongs that they see taking place.

According to the universal principles and foundations of contract law (See Background, Part I), in the absence of a genuine agreement, no contract exists. What does exist is nothing more than a presumption of contract based on the deceived party (you) having foolishly trusted in the government. Although fraud is unlawful, it is not illegal in artificial State rulership systems. Keep in mind, once again, that all governments are structurally fraudulent due to the origins of their artificial conception. Based on this premise of evidence, it’s an obvious fact that fraud must be “legal” as governments are able to judge themselves as legal in the first place. In other words, the existence of a government is a legality of fraud ab initio.

Holder in Due Course

In Commercial Law, the ultimate owner of any “Document of Title” is known as the “Holder in Due Course” (HDC). He is the only one who possesses a valid claim to “title” whereby the goods or property are deliverable to him. By comparison, a technical “Holder” may legally possess a “Negotiable Instrument”, but he lacks the ultimate claim of “title” held by the HDC and is nothing more than a receiver and collector of payments. The HDC receives the delivery of the property; the Holder merely receives payment for the property.

UCC 1-201 DEFINITIONS–(20) “Holder,” with respect to a negotiable instrument, means the person in possession if the instrument is payable to bearer or, in the case of an instrument payable to an identified person, if the identified person is in possession. “Holder,” with respect to a document of title, means the person in possession if the goods are deliverableto bearer or to the order of the person in possession.

UCC 3-302 HOLDER IN DUE COURSE–Subject to subsection (c) and Section 3-106(d), “holder in due course” means the holder of an instrument if: (1) the instrument when issued or negotiated to the holder does not bear such apparent evidence of forgery or alteration or is not otherwise so irregular or incomplete as to call into question its authenticity; and (2) the holder took the instrument (i) for value, (ii) in good faith, (iii) without notice that the instrument is overdue or has been dishonored or that there is an uncured default with respect to payment of another instrument issued as part of the same series, (iv) without notice that the instrument contains an unauthorized signature or has been altered, (v) without notice of any claim to the instrument described in Section 3-306, and (vi) without notice that any party has a defense or claim in recoupment described in Section 3-305(a).

As stated earlier, your Birth Certificate is simply a warehouse receipt. Birth Certificates are bundled together and transferred or purchased in “bulk sales” under one or more of the provisions found in UCC 6-104 through 108. However, possession of your Birth Certificate was not taken by the government in “good faith” and the legal Holder (government) cannot “enforce the instrument free from all claims and personal defenses.” This means that whoever, or whatever artificial entity, is now acting as the purported “owner” of your Birth Certificate can, in legal reality, only be only a technical “Holder” of the Negotiable Instrument and can never be the actual “Holder in due Course”. Only you can be the HDC.

The HDC is the most powerful position in any exchange of property or goods in commercial law. The allodial key to understanding this lies in whether you are or are not the HDC of your Document of Title of birth, the Negotiable Instrument to your legal existence. Once you see that you are the legal HDC to your own Title of Rights, your whole worldly life will change dramatically. You are then, once again, a sovereign with respect to anything of which you are the Holder in Due Course. This will make you the HDC of “yourself”, both the real biological person and the artificial persona. It will place you as the ultimate owner of all your earthly affairs and everything else concerning ownership of your legal life. When you really think about it, this is the “legal” means by which your physical being and your Spiritual being can join together in true Freedom and Liberty.

The “secret” to becoming the HDC is known as “Acceptance for Value.” Your Birth Certificate (Document of Title) is currently held by “unknown parties” who can never be the HDC of it. Only you, and you alone, can become the HDC. When your offer of “purchase” is made, title passes upon acceptance of the offer. The offer (your UCC-1) is accepted by the previous Holder (the government) when they record it in the State records for a fee payment (value). The “acceptance for value” is made by the government in accordance with two Rules of law: One, the fee paid for recording the instrument; Two, since it is recorded without objection, it is also accepted by their own conduct, both implied and direct.

All that remains to do at this point is to give or show affidavit evidence of the exchange (a copy of your recorded UCC-1 Financing Statement with the State acceptance seal and certification). “Acceptance” and “offer” are the two mandatory elements to any legal contract in commercial law. “Acceptance” or “Acceptance for Value”, for the purpose of commercial law, is “acquiescence”. Look carefully at these definitions written by Canadian lawyer Lloyd Duhaime from Duhaime’s Law Dictionary:

Acceptance . A contract is a legally binding agreement between two or more parties which starts with an offer from one person but which does not become a contract until the other party signifies an unequivocal willingness to accept the terms of that offer. The moment of acceptance is the moment from which a contract is said to exist, and not before. Acceptance need not always be direct and can be implied by conduct. 

Acquiescence. Action or inaction which binds a person legally even though it was not intended as such. For example, action which is not intended as a direct acceptance of a contract will nevertheless stand as such as it implies recognition of the terms of the contract. If I display a basket of fruit in a marketplace and you come by, inspect an apple and then bite into it, you have acquiesced to the contract of sale of that apple.

Offer. An explicit proposal to contract which, if accepted, completes the contract and binds both the person that made the offer and the person accepting the offer to the terms of the contract.

In this modern world, man’s laws dictate that there are only two classes of people in any legal proceeding. You are either a Creditor or a Debtor. When your “legal sovereignty” is established, you become the sovereign Creditor of your life and affairs. Every adverse party then becomes your Debtor. However, if you do notestablish your legal sovereignty, you do not “own” yourself (your own title) as the HDC; you have no legal capacity; you have no “standing in law” to assert your Rights; and you will remain a permanent Debtor as you are now. As Debtor, you will always lose in every dispute or claim by the current “system” for “failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted”.

Reclaiming the legal ownership of your persona (straw man) acts as an “equitable estoppel” to any and all who come against you in commerce and law.
equitable estoppel. An estoppel that prevents a person from adopting a new position that contradicts a previous position maintained by words, silence, or actions when allowing the new position to be adopted would unfairly harm another person who has relied on the previous position to his or her loss. (called alsoestoppel in pais). Source- Merriam Webster’s Dictionary of Law 1996.

If you do not reclaim your legal Rights of title and ownership to your persona, which makes you the Creditor and absolute sovereign ruler of your “straw man”, you will not be sovereign and you will lose every claim made against you. This is the reason why, if you ever think of hiring an ABA attorney to represent you in any legal proceeding against the “system”, you must demand up front that he make you the Holder in Due Course of the action. Since he legally can’t do this, then you will lose if he “appears” for or “represents” you. The best any Bar(fly) attorney can do is make a deal with the system Creditor, which is a negotiated settlement of the money being claimed as damages. You must be the HDC to be able to ensure victory in all dealings with the government and the “system”.

We conclude Part V with some Maxims for you to absorb:

Quod initio vitiosum est, non potest tractu temporis convalescere– Time cannot render valid an act void in its origin.

Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus– False in one thing, false in everything.

Quae malasunt inchoata in principio vex peragantur exitu– Things bad in the commencement seldom end well.

Quod ab initio non valet, in tractu temporis non convalescere– What is not good in the beginning cannot be rendered good by time.

You are now ready for Part VI, How to secure your Freedom through use of a Financing Statement.

Part VI: How to Secure Your Freedom

The Money Game

As we stated earlier, the corporate entity known as the United States is bankrupt. Congress confirmed this bankruptcy through the “Joint Resolution to Suspend The Gold Standard And Abrogate The Gold Clause, June 5, 1933” in H. J. Res. 192, 73rd Congress, 1st session, Public Law 73-10. Within this 1933 Public Law, it states in part “…every provision contained in or made with respect to any obligation which purports to give the obligee a right to require payment in gold or a particular kind of coin or currency, or in an amount in money of the United States measured thereby, is declared to be against public policy”. In 1950, the corporate U.S. declared bankruptcy a second time whereby the Secretary of Treasury was appointed as “Receiver” of the bankruptcy in Reorganization Plan No. 26, Title 5 USC 903, Public Law 94-564, Legislative History, page 5967.

The issuance of paper as a “legal tender” and circulating medium of exchange did not occur until 1862 during Lincoln’s War. The Congress authorized the issuance of non-interest bearing Treasury notes and declared the resulting bills of credit to be legal tender for all debts, public and private, with the exception of taxes on imports. The notes were deemed necessary to “float the debt of the United States” for the war effort. In reality, the corporate United States was already bankrupt. On June 3, 1864, Congress passed “An Act to provide a National Currency, secured by a Pledge of United States Bonds, and to provide for the Circulation and Redemption thereof.” Today, “Federal Reserve Notes” are officially recognized as “SDR’s” — Special Drawing Rights — under the amended Breton Wood Agreements Act, Public Law 94-564. See further Legislative History, Senate Report No. 94-1148, October 1, 1976.

As you can see, there is no lawful money in circulation today. What the average American thinks is “money” is nothing more than private commercial debt instruments made of paper, “legal tender”, evidencing the debt Americans are required to pay against the collective bankruptcy of the federal government. Real money is a tangible substance such as gold, silver, produce of the earth, or labor. Real money can never be debt. The original Mint Act was passed on Thursday, January 12, 1792. This Act was drafted in Pursuance with the Constitution for the United States of America [See Article VI, Clause 2] and provided for the minting of both gold and silver dollars under Section 9. This Act met all of the requirements of Article I, Section 8, Clause 5 and 6, and Article I, Section 10, Clause I.

The use of real money is a Right of sovereigns, not slaves. Debt is created by a mere signature authorizing notes of indebtedness. All “money” in circulation today is created from further borrowing against our federal bankruptcy. Only by borrowing against a government’s bankruptcy can its servants and slaves have pieces of paper to spend like money, even thought they are purely notes of indebtedness.

Unless one is the Holder in Due Course of one’s straw man, “owning” such paper debt Notes or anything it buys is a liability, not an asset. The fact that people mistakenly consider Federal Reserve Notes to be assets is a major cause of the problem we all face. Whenever a “person” accumulates private Federal Reserve Notes (FRN’s), he is accumulating more debt. The more FRN’s you have; the more commercial goods, property and services you purchase with them; the more indebted you become.

Since all purported money is created by the further borrowing against our federal government’s bankruptcy by signature, every time you sign your name to any public document, or contract, or instrument involving FRN’s as the “valuable” consideration, you borrow against and increase your own debt. By increasing your borrowing and indebtedness you are providing yourself with more debt instruments to “spend.” This is a tell-tale sign of a slave in permanent indentured servitude; he commits himself further and further in debt every time he borrows from his sovereign task-master. Again, since all modern paper money is created by borrowing against the collective bankruptcy of the corporate United States, it is mathematically impossible to ever pay off the debt. This is a never ending nightmare that must end; and when it does, the common American will suffer greatly if he has not been diligent to break his bonds of servitude.


 
NOTICE: Information served herein is for educational purposes only, no liability assumed for use. The information you obtain in this presentation is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice. Author does not consent to unlawful action. Author advocates and encourages one and all to adhere to, support and defend all law which is particularly applicable. If anything in this presentation is found to be in error a good faith effort will be made to correct it in timely fashion upon notification. VOID where prohibited by law.

_______________________________________________________________
DISCLOSURE: KnowTheLedge©AND ITS AFFILIATS ARE NOT AN ATTORNEY AND NOTHING ON THIS SITE SHALL BE
CONSIDERED OR CONSTRUED AS LEGAL ADVICE. KnowTheLedge©IS a principal working with
THE UNIVERSE. KnowTheLedge© AND ITS AFFLIATES ARE qualified to counsel on general ideas and public
knowledge, but, KnowTheLedge© DOES not offer legal advice, tax advice or financial
advice. EVERYTHING PRESENTED HEREIN IS FOR EDUCATIONAL AND ENTERTAINMENT PURPOSES ONLY!

Basic information
Vendor:
UNIVERSE
Vendor catalogue no.:
TIME FOR REDEMPTION
Weight:
IN GOLD
Warranty (months):
6